Why Scientists Study Long-Lived Animals to Understand Aging
From Everendium · Last reviewed November 1, 2026
Quick answer
Most aging research uses mice, worms, and flies because they are convenient, but they are short-lived. A smaller group of researchers studies animals that live far longer than their size predicts: naked mole rats that live past 30 with little sign of decline, bowhead whales that live about 200 years, bats that live the equivalent of several human lifetimes, and a Greenland shark dated at roughly 400 years. The emerging answer is that long-lived species accumulate molecular damage more slowly, through better DNA repair, more accurate protein-making machinery, and cancer defenses. Whether any of this can be transferred to people is unknown.
Most of what science knows about aging comes from three animals: the fruit fly, a tiny worm, and the laboratory mouse. They are easy to keep and quick to age. A mouse lives two or three years. That convenience has a cost, and a small group of researchers has taken a different route: study the animals that refuse to age on schedule.
Why study animals that live a long time?
Because evolution has already run the experiment. Steven Austad, an aging researcher and author of Methuselah’s Zoo, told the Boston Globe that nature has had several billion years to try ways of making animals resist aging. The question, as a Knowable Magazine feature frames it, is twofold: why did some species evolve long lives, and what genetic and metabolic tricks let them do it? A house mouse and a naked mole rat are about the same size; one lives three years and the other more than 35.
Which animals are the standouts?
- Naked mole rats. Hairless, nearly blind rodents that live in underground colonies in East Africa. They live past 30 in captivity and show what biologists call negligible senescence: no clear rise in death rate with age, reproduction into old age, and strong resistance to cancer, according to a 2005 review by Rochelle Buffenstein, who has studied them for decades. Their longevity relative to their size is similar to humans’.
- Bowhead whales. The second-largest living mammal, with an estimated lifespan of about 200 years, at least double what their size predicts. A study in Nature found their cells have an unusually strong ability to repair DNA, according to a 2026 feature.
- Bats. Some bat species live more than 40 years in the wild despite being mouse-sized. The bat biologist Emma Teeling has said that is the equivalent of 240 to 280 human years with little sign of aging.
- The Greenland shark. In 2016 scientists used radiocarbon dating of eye tissue to estimate the age of the oldest shark they examined at 392 years, give or take 120, which would make it the longest-lived vertebrate known. Even its century-old eyes showed no sign of degeneration, according to a 2026 feature.
- Others. A clam, Arctica islandica, has been dated to 507 years; a Laysan albatross was still laying eggs at 69 or older.
What have researchers found?
The common thread is that long-lived species accumulate molecular damage more slowly, though they get there by different routes:
- More accurate protein-making. Vera Gorbunova’s lab at the University of Rochester found that the naked mole rat’s ribosome, the cellular machine that assembles proteins, makes about a tenth as many errors as a mouse’s, and that across 17 rodent species longer life went with more accurate ribosomes.
- Better DNA repair. Gorbunova’s team compared 18 rodent species and found longer-lived ones repaired a damaging kind of DNA break more efficiently. Bowhead whale cells are exceptional at it.
- Cancer defenses. All long-lived animals must delay cancer, and they do it differently: naked mole rats through an unusual molecule that makes cells stick together, bowhead whales through DNA repair, according to the Knowable feature.
- Slower epigenetic drift. Steve Horvath at UCLA found that the pattern of chemical tags on DNA, which changes with age, predicts maximum lifespan across species. Teeling’s group found the same across 26 bat species.
Vadim Gladyshev of Harvard Medical School summed up the underlying view to Knowable: damage accumulates over time, and in essence that is aging.
Can any of this help people?
Possibly, but nothing has yet. Scientists have transferred a naked mole rat gene into mice and found the mice aged in better health, with less frailty and fewer markers of cellular aging, according to the Boston Globe. The same report notes that researchers caution there are trade-offs, and that the National Institutes of Health recently funded a study of the 500-year clam. A mouse with a mole rat gene is a long way from a human therapy. For what has and hasn’t worked in people, see can scientists slow biological aging.
What are the limits of this research?
Long-lived animals are hard to study for the obvious reason: an experiment on a bowhead whale’s lifespan would outlast the scientist. Much of the work therefore compares tissues and genomes rather than following animals through life. The animals also evolved their longevity for their own reasons, safety from predators in a burrow or a cave, a cold slow life in the deep sea, and those reasons may not translate. Even so, the field has already changed how aging is understood: not as one clock but as the slow accumulation of damage that some species have learned to limit. See why we age and die and is any animal immortal.
This is general educational information, not medical advice. Research in this area moves quickly and this page reflects sources available at the date shown; check the date and the sources before relying on a specific claim.
Sources
- Knowable Magazine via Smithsonian Magazine (2021) - Why scientists are studying the genetic tricks of the longest-lived animals(News)
- Knowable Magazine via Big Think - The longest-living animals (quotes Teeling, Gorbunova, Buffenstein, Horvath)(News)
- Knowable Magazine via Inverse - One misunderstood animal might help humans live longer(News)
- Boston Globe (March 2026) - What Earth's longest-lived animals can teach us about aging better (quotes Steven Austad)(News)
- Independent on Saturday (March 2026) - Unlocking the secrets of longevity: what animals can teach us about ageing(News)
- Buffenstein (2005), Journals of Gerontology: Biological Sciences - The naked mole-rat: a new long-living model for human aging research (abstract)(Academic or research)
About this review
Everendium Editorial Team · last reviewed November 1, 2026.
Written November 1, 2026 from a Knowable Magazine feature republished by Smithsonian, Big Think, and Inverse (quoting researchers Emma Teeling, Vera Gorbunova, Rochelle Buffenstein, Vadim Gladyshev, and Steve Horvath), a 2026 Boston Globe feature quoting Steven Austad, a 2026 South African newspaper feature, and a 2005 review by Buffenstein in the Journals of Gerontology. It has not been reviewed by a named expert. Recommended for review by a biogerontologist before this article is promoted widely. Limits: most findings were reached through science journalism rather than the original papers; the field is active and specific claims change.
Related reading
Make this easier for your family.
Record what you've just read in your Final Day Plan, then download it as a PDF. Nothing is stored online.