Skip to main content

Part of Everendium's Faith, Culture & Traditions guides.

Faith, Culture & Traditions

Jehovah's Witnesses' Views on Blood Transfusions and Medical Care

Quick answer

Jehovah's Witnesses generally decline whole blood transfusions and certain blood components based on their interpretation of biblical passages about abstaining from blood, though individual members may make their own conscience-based decisions about specific blood fractions or alternatives. This is directly relevant to advance directives - many Jehovah's Witnesses carry a specific advance medical directive document addressing this, and it's worth documenting clearly as part of any broader end-of-life planning.

About this guidance

Reviewed by:
Everendium Editorial Team
Last reviewed:
August 27, 2026
Type:
Faith, Culture & Traditions
Applies to:
More

For families navigating advance care planning, this is one of the most practically important things to document clearly and early - not left to be figured out during a medical emergency.

Why do many Jehovah’s Witnesses decline blood transfusions?

Many Jehovah’s Witnesses decline whole blood transfusions and certain blood components, based on their interpretation of biblical passages instructing abstinence from blood. This is a widely known, well-documented position within the tradition, though it’s genuinely important not to assume it applies identically to every individual.

Is this an absolute rule for every individual?

No - positions on specific blood fractions, blood-derived medications, and alternative treatments can vary by individual conscience. Rather than assuming a single, universal position, the most respectful and practically useful approach is asking the specific person directly what their own wishes are, and documenting it clearly.

Why does documentation matter so much here?

A medical crisis is the worst possible time to have this conversation for the first time. Many Jehovah’s Witnesses carry a specific advance medical directive addressing blood transfusion preferences directly - having this documented and readily accessible removes ambiguity for both family members and the medical team when decisions may need to be made quickly.

See our general guide to advance directives, living wills, and healthcare proxies for how this fits into broader advance care planning, and consider incorporating this specifically into a Final Day Plan.

What should a family or medical team do if this hasn’t been documented?

Asking directly and early, before a medical crisis, is far better than guessing. Many hospitals have real experience with bloodless medicine protocols and alternative treatment approaches - raising this directly and early with a healthcare provider, not only in a moment of crisis, allows for genuine advance planning rather than reactive decision-making.

Is organ donation the same question?

No - views on organ donation specifically are addressed separately, since it’s a related but genuinely distinct question. See our guide on organ donation and end-of-life care.

What should I tell my family?

Since positions on specific blood fractions and treatments genuinely vary by individual, your family and medical team need to hear your own specific wishes directly rather than assume a general position applies to you.

Add this to your Final Day Plan: your specific wishes about blood transfusions and blood-derived treatments, documented in an advance directive - this is exactly the kind of detail that shouldn’t be figured out for the first time during a medical crisis.

This reflects a general, widely documented position - individual views and specific medical circumstances vary. This is educational information, not medical or legal advice; specific decisions should be made with the person’s own healthcare providers and documented directives.

Sources

Related glossary terms

Make this easier for your family.

Add what you've just read to your Final Day Plan — free, and saved for later.

Start My Final Day Plan →